![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
Home : Publications: Arthritis in Canada - An Ongoing Challenge |
Chapter 6
|
Table 6-1 Age-standardized rates of total hip and knee replacement per 100,000 population, by province, Canada, 1994 and 2000 |
||||||||
Province |
Hip Replacements |
Knee Replacements |
||||||
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
|||||
1994 |
2000 |
1994 |
2000 |
1994 |
2000 |
1994 |
2000 |
|
Newfoundland and Labrador |
28 |
24 |
37 |
34 |
30 |
29 |
36 |
43 |
Prince Edward Island |
54 |
58 |
50 |
50 |
56 |
63 |
60 |
60 |
Nova Scotia |
49 |
49 |
59 |
60 |
61 |
86 |
68 |
99 |
New Brunswick |
41 |
37 |
40 |
48 |
40 |
69 |
49 |
76 |
Quebec |
26 |
29 |
25 |
29 |
21 |
29 |
32 |
41 |
Ontario |
45 |
49 |
50 |
54 |
53 |
68 |
61 |
85 |
Manitoba |
43 |
54 |
46 |
53 |
39 |
77 |
48 |
94 |
Saskatchewan |
51 |
57 |
56 |
63 |
55 |
66 |
73 |
87 |
Alberta |
56 |
61 |
68 |
67 |
56 |
70 |
74 |
86 |
British Columbia |
42 |
47 |
51 |
51 |
42 |
56 |
47 |
65 |
CANADA |
40 |
45 |
44 |
48 |
42 |
58 |
52 |
71 |
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) |
The average length of hospital stay for hip replacements was slightly longer than for knee replacements, likely reflecting the more routine nature of knee replacements. The average length of hospital stay for women was higher than for men for both hip and knee replacements (Figure 6-11). Previous findings have shown that women are more disabled at the time of replacement and require more assistance with daily activities, largely because they are more likely to be living alone. These findings may explain the longer length of hospital stay for women as compared with men.
Figure 6-11 Average length of stay for patients with arthritis or a related condition undergoing total hip or knee replacement, by sex, Canada, 2000
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR)
The average length of stay in hospital for a total hip or knee replacement varied considerably by province in 2000 (Figures 6-12 and 6-13). Provinces performing the higher rates of hip and knee replacements per capita tended to have the lower average lengths of stay.
Figure 6-12 Average length of stay for patients with arthritis or a related condition undergoing total hip replacement surgery, by sex and province, Canada, 2000
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR)
Figure 6-13 Average length of stay for patients with arthritis or a related condition undergoing total knee replacement surgery, by sex and province, Canada, 2000
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR)
Other orthopedic procedures
Replacement of other joints was less frequent than that of the hip or knee, probably reflecting the higher prevalence of hip and knee arthritis. Unlike hip and knee replacements, the rate of replacement of other joints was higher among men than women (Figure 6-14). The rate overall increased by more than 20% over time.
Figure 6-14 Age-standardized rates of other replacements per 100,000 population for selected provinces*, Canada, 1994-2000
* BC, ON & NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
The rate of replacement of joints other than the hip or knee increased with age, peaking in the 55-64 age group. Replacement of other joints was more common in men than in women under 65 years of age but more common in women over 74 years of age (Figure 6-15).
Figure 6-15 Rates of other replacements per 100,000 population for selected provinces*, by age and sex, Canada, 1994-2000
* BC, ON & NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
Between 1994 and 2000, the vast majority of knee procedures, with the exclusion of knee replacements, were performed arthroscopically (Figure 6-16). The rate of arthroscopic procedures remained fairly stable, and the rate of the other knee procedures (inpatient procedures) decreased by one-half.
Figure 6-16 Age- and sex-standardized rates of knee procedures (excluding total knee replacements) for selected provinces* per 100,000 population, Canada, 1994-2000
* BC, ON, NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
In 2000, the rate of arthroscopic knee procedures varied with age, peaking in the 55-64 year age group among women and in the 45-54 year age group among men (Figure 6-17). These procedures are often used as surgical management of early arthritis,5 explaining the high use of these procedures in the younger age groups relative to the other relevant procedures presented. Unlike joint replacements, the rates for arthroscopic knee procedures were greater among men with arthritis and related conditions than women, especially in the younger age groups. The difference between the sexes in the use of these procedures may reflect the greater exposure of males to injury from physically demanding jobs or sports, which is a risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis.
Figure 6-17 Rate of knee arthroscopy per 100,000 population in selected provinces*, by age and sex, Canada, 2000
* BC, ON & NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
The rates of arthritis-related spine and other non-knee procedures were much lower than rates of replacement and arthroscopy procedures (Figure 6-18). Rates of spine and other non-knee procedures varied with age, with a general decline in the oldest age groups (Figure 6-19). In most age groups, women recorded higher rates of spine and other non- knee procedures than men.
Figure 6-18 Age- and sex-standardized rates of spine and other non-knee procedures per 100,000 population for selected provinces*, Canada, 1994-2000
* BC, ON, NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
Figure 6-19 Rate of spine and other non-knee procedures per 100,000 population in selected provinces*, by age and sex, Canada, 2000
* BC, ON, NB only
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract
Database (DAD)
The rates of all procedures varied dramatically by province. Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Saskatchewan reported the highest rates of knee arthroscopy, and Saskatchewan reported the highest rate of other knee procedures. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia reported the highest rates of non-knee procedures, followed by Saskatchewan and Ontario (Table 6-2).
Across the provinces, other knee procedures varied the most (coefficient of variation = 0.8), and non-knee procedures varied the least (coefficient of variation = 0.3).
The data regarding all orthopedic procedures covered in this chapter reveal the dramatic variation among the provinces in 2000. No single province had consistently high or low rates across all procedures. The smaller provinces showed the largest deviation from national rates as a result of the small numbers of procedures in these jurisdictions.
Table 6-2 Variation in the age- and sex-standardized rate of selected arthritis relevant procedures performed, by province*, Canada, 2000 |
|||||
Province |
Other Replacement (per 100,000) |
Knee: Arthroscopy (per 100,000) |
Knee: Other (per 100,000) |
Spine (per |
Non-knee: Other |
B.C. |
33 |
255 |
17 |
0.76 |
54 |
Sask. |
66 |
339 |
49 |
0.00 |
68 |
Ont. |
37 |
231 |
21 |
1.99 |
70 |
N.B. |
55 |
377 |
16 |
0.81 |
93 |
N.S. |
53 |
248 |
9 |
0.00 |
89 |
Nfld |
12 |
122 |
2 |
0.00 |
57 |
P.E.I. |
0 |
424 |
0 |
0.00 |
46 |
Canada* |
37 |
244 |
20 |
1.88 |
67 |
Coefficient of Variation** |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
* Excluding AB, MB and QC ** Higher coefficient of variation represents greater variation from the mean. Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)/Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) |
Discussion
Between 1994 and 2000, the per capita rate of medical admissions associated with arthritis showed an overall decrease, although this was comparatively less than that of all other admissions. The decrease likely reflects the change in patterns of delivery of care over the last 10 years,4 which saw the increasing substitution of outpatient for inpatient care for cost containment reasons. In addition, improvements in pharmacological and surgical treatments for arthritis may also explain some of the decrease in hospitalization for its medical consequences.
The number of arthritis-related orthopedic procedures per capita has remained remarkably static since 1994, despite increases in the national prevalence of arthritis (see Chapter 2), the main indication for these procedures.6 Nevertheless, the total number of both inpatient and outpatient procedures has increased since 1994. The number of inpatient procedures increased modestly (approximately 10%) as a result of a dramatic increase in the number of hip and knee replacements. The number of outpatient procedures increased by just over 10% and is likely the result of the increased use of the less invasive arthroscopy (key hole surgery) to perform many procedures.
A number of new technologies are emerging in the surgical treatment of arthritis and related disorders. These include new materials technology for the bearing surfaces of hip and knee replacements (cross-linked polyethylene, ceramics and metal bearings). These new bearing surfaces should prolong the service life of joint replacements to beyond 15 years. Additional trends include minimally invasive techniques for knee and hip replacement surgery. In the near future, computer-assisted joint replacement surgery will allow surgeons to implant artificial joints with greater precision and accuracy. The emergence of these and other improved surgical tools for the treatment of arthritis will likely increase the demand for surgery.
In the future, access to surgical procedures may be limited by the availability of resources, including surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and operating room space, dissemination of techniques and restrictions on procedure volumes by hospital administrations. Special initiatives aimed at expanding the use of hip and knee replacements in various provinces have had partial success in increasing availability. Nevertheless, long waiting times7 and unmet need8 stand as proof that the current level of access does not match demand.
With the exception of hip and knee replacement, there is little consensus about the clinical criteria for the surgical procedures examined in this chapter.9-11As a result, it is difficult to assess the appropriateness of either current rates or changes over time. This is particularly relevant for knee arthroscopy, given the particularly high rates in Canada.
The length of waiting times for surgical procedures can provide an indication of excess demand. Several provincial and regional collaborations are developing methods to assist in the management of waiting lists for various types of surgery, although as yet waiting times for any of the orthopedic procedures are not tracked nationally. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry team at CIHI is developing a pilot study for the collection of waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery at the national level.
Although hip and knee replacement procedures are slightly more commonly performed on women than men, this does not wholly reflect the greater need among women.8 The higher prevalence of arthritis among women is only partially reflected in the rates of orthopedic procedures. While the higher rates of joint injury requiring repair among younger men may partially explain this difference for some of the procedures (particularly knee arthroscopy), it does raise the question of gender equity in the use of these services. The higher rate of arthritis-associated medical admissions among women reflected the higher rate of arthritis.
The use of all arthritis and related care increased markedly with age, mirroring the increase in the prevalence of arthritis with age. While the rate of medical admissions continued to climb, however, the rate of orthopedic procedures reached a plateau in the older age groups.
Variation among the provinces in both orthopedic procedures and medical admissions was considerable, even after adjusting for differing age and sex compositions. Variations in the need for surgery are unlikely to account for the large disparity in rates. Many factors, such as province-specific health service provision and funding, manpower levels,12 physician reimbursement methods,13 physician attitudes14 and expertise, as well as lack of guidelines for the appropriate use of surgical procedures all play a role in the large disparity in rates.
Implications
Despite an increase in the prevalence of arthritis in Canada, overall rates of orthopedic procedures have remained steady. This suggests that the system may be operating at capacity and may not be able to respond to increases in the number of people with arthritis.
Although the rate of hip and knee replacements is increasing, the long waiting times for these procedures indicate that the capacity is insufficient to meet either current or future needs.
The continued development of national and provincial registries related to hip and knee replacement would help ensure complete coverage. If appropriate in scope, such registries could enable tracking of waiting times, patient-based indicators of need, complications after surgery and failure rates of prostheses.
The large provincial variations in rates of surgery for arthritis and related conditions, which are unlikely to be accounted for by differences in factors such as prevalence, suggest unequal access to orthopedic surgery across Canada. The causes of provincial variations and their impact at both the individual and population levels need to be determined.
Currently, the published data on arthroscopic knee surgery for osteoarthritis are unclear on its effectiveness. More research is required in this area to properly define the appropriate indications for these procedures.
The decline in rates of surgery at older ages and sex differences in surgery rates raise issues of inequities in access to care that need to be investigated.
Linking hospitalization data with provincial physician billing data would facilitate better understanding of the processes of arthritis care and the outcomes of surgery.
[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Last Updated: 2003-10-17 | ![]() |